AIDS Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about AIDS, including details on testing, treatment, prevention, hiv, life expectancy. | ||||||||
|
Could the new HIV combined p24 antigen and antibody assays replace p24 antigen specific assays?Ly TD, Ebel A, Faucher V, Fihman V, Laperche S Laboratoire L.C.L. (Claude Lévy), Ivry sur Seine, Paris, France. t.ly@lablcl.com The performance of twelve HIV combined p24 antigen and antibody assays available in Europe were compared. The assays were examined with a total of 1983 samples that included 1005 unselected HIV negative samples, 7 HIV-1 p24 Ag reference samples with HIV-1 Ag, 10 samples of a HIV antigen sensitivity commercial panel, 124 samples of 31 p24 antigen panels of different HIV-1 subtypes, 168 members of 24 HIV-1 seroconversion panels, 559 HIV-1 (groups M and O) antibody positive samples and 110 HIV-2 antibody positive samples. The specificity ranged from 99.4 to 100%. Ten of the 12 assays detected all anti-HIV positive samples irrespective of genotype while two assays missed one sample each (one subtype F and one subtype C). The combined assays could be classified into three groups. The first includes two assays (Enzygnost HIV Integral and Vironostika Ag/Ab) that have a clinical sensitivity similar to the two antibody only assays. The second includes the seven assays that detected infection after the p24 antigen only assay and show a delay from 3.3 to 5.17 days after HIV-1 RNA. The third group detected the infection before the p24 antigen assay and less than 3 days after nucleic acid testing (NAT). The improved ability to detect p24 Ag, at levels similar to specific HIV Ag assays, suggests that these new HIV combined Ag/Ab assays could replace p24 antigen only assays in situations for blood or organ screening when NAT is not feasible or not affordable. Published 29 May 2007 in J Virol Methods, 143(1): 86-94.
© 2004-2008 AIDS Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||
